Interracial dating right or wrong
Whatever one’s views of marriage and however the state defines it, there is no compelling state interest in forcing all citizens to facilitate, participate in, or celebrate a same-sex relationship as a marriage.
Believing that marriage is the union of man and woman is a reasonable position held by many.
Bans on interracial marriage, by contrast, were grossly unreasonable.
Protecting religious liberty and the rights of conscience does not restrict anyone’s freedom to enter into whatever romantic partnerships he or she wishes.
As a result, such beliefs and actions deserve protection against government coercion.The argument over redefining marriage to include same-sex relationships is one over the nature of marriage.Great thinkers throughout human history—and from every political community up until the year 2000—thought it reasonable to view marriage as the union of male and female, husband and wife, mother and father.Indeed, support for marriage as the union of man and woman has been a near human universal.
Is opposition to same-sex marriage at all like opposition to interracial marriage?
One refrain in debates over marriage policy is that laws designating marriage as exclusively the union of male and female are today's equivalent of bans on interracial marriage.